Unravelling the DNA sequences carried by Streptomyces coelicolor membrane vesicles

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 16651 (2022) Cite this article

1233 Accesses

2 Citations

6 Altmetric

Metrics details

Membrane vesicles (MVs) are spherical particles with nanoscale dimensions and characterized by the presence of diverse cargos, such as nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, and cellular metabolites. Many examples of (micro)organisms producing MVs are reported in literature. Among them, bacterial MVs are of particular interest because they are now considered as the fourth mechanism of horizontal gene transfer. Streptomyces bacteria are well-known for their ecological roles and ability to synthesize bioactive compounds, with Streptomyces coelicolor being the model organism. It was previously demonstrated that it can produce distinct populations of MVs characterized by different protein and metabolite cargos. In this work we demonstrated for the first time that MVs of S. coelicolor carry both DNA and RNA and that their DNA content represents the entire chromosome of the bacterium. These findings suggest that MV DNA could have a role in the evolution of Streptomyces genomes and that MVs could be exploited in new strain engineering strategies.

Bacterial membrane vesicles (MVs) are spherical and membranous particles with nanometer diameter and their cargo includes various macromolecules—such as nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), lipids, and proteins (i.e., enzymes and toxins)—and small molecules—such as cellular metabolites, signals, and bioactive molecules (i.e., antibiotics)1,2,3,4. The release of MVs can facilitate many biological functions such as nutrient uptake, competition, survival, stress response, intercellular communication, and horizontal gene transfer (HGT)1,3,5. In the context of HGT, which is recognized as one of the major forces driving the shaping of genes and genomes and their evolution6, the MVs may play a (very) important role. The main studied mechanisms of HGT in prokaryotes are transformation, conjugation, and transduction6,7. However, in recent years MVs have been considered as the fourth mechanism of HGT, called vesiduction5,8,9,10. Indeed, different types of genetic material, such as chromosomal, plasmid, and/or phage DNA, together with sRNA, mRNA, and miRNA, have been detected inside MVs or in association with their membrane5,8,9,11. The occurrence of HGT mediated by MVs has been observed in many studies: for example, Klieve et al.12 demonstrated, for the first time, the association of DNA with MVs released by Gram-positive bacteria belonging to the Ruminococcus genus, and the capability of these MVs to restore a specific metabolic activity in mutant strains12. Moreover, MVs have been reported to transfer plasmids between different strains 13,14 and DNA cargo into eukaryotic host cells 15.

In addition, extracellular DNA (eDNA) is an important component of bacterial biofilm matrix allowing cell adherence in the early stages of biofilm formation. In Streptococcus mutans planktonic cells eDNA is released also by a lysis-independent mode involving MVs. Thus, eDNA in MVs of planktonic cultures may play some role in the early stage of biofilm formation promoting bacterial colonization. Moreover, it is reported that MV eDNA influences biofilm structural integrity and stability16.

Only 4% of the studies on prokaryotic membrane vesicles conducted between 1972 and 2021 concern MVs of Gram-positive bacteria17: indeed, it has been assumed for a long time that Gram-positive bacteria could not produce vesicles, because of the lack of an outer membrane layer and the presence of thick cell walls1. In recent years, Gram-positive MVs have gained more attention and their release was demonstrated in both pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains, such as Staphylococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Lactobacillus spp., and Streptomyces spp.4,18,19,20,21.

Streptomyces is a genus of filamentous Gram-positive bacteria that are ubiquitous in terrestrial and marine environments, where they can live in symbiosis, for example, with plants, fungi, insects, and sponges22: adaptation to such diverse ecological niches and interaction with other (micro)organisms have led to the peculiar chemical diversity of their bioactive metabolites, whose production is regulated by a complex network of environmental signals, such as nutrient shortage and presence of competitors22,23,24. Streptomycetes have a complex life cycle as the mycelium of a colony is formed by distinct cell types (i.e., vegetative hyphae, aerial hyphae, and spores) and even different subpopulations: indeed, Streptomyces colonies have been recently described as similar to colonies of social insects with labor division, because of the presence of mutant cell subpopulations that are characterized by deletions and/or amplifications in the arms of their linear chromosomes, and that hyperproduce antibiotics at the expenses of their own fitness25,26.

In these bacteria, conjugation is the most studied mechanism of HGT, as it has been studied since the 1950s with experiments involving prototrophic strains and auxotrophic mutants27,28,29. A peculiar feature of conjugation in Streptomyces is the formation of the so-called pocks: when spores of a strain carrying a plasmid were co-cultivated with an excess of recipient strain spores, circular zones of growth retardation in the mycelial lawn of the recipient were observed30. The pocking phenotype was associated with the plasmid transfer as the donor plasmid was found in the cells forming the pock30. In addition, while in unicellular bacteria conjugative plasmids are transferred as a single stranded DNA from the donor to the recipient through a Type IV secretion system that involves multiple proteins, Streptomyces conjugation consists in the transfer of double stranded DNA and a protein encoded by the conjugative plasmid (i.e., TraB) is required31,32,33,34,35,36.

Streptomyces coelicolor is considered the model organism for the study of Streptomycetes. We have very recently demonstrated that S. coelicolor grown in liquid cultures releases MVs of different sizes and with specific protein and metabolic cargos4. However, it is not still clear whether specific DNA fragments or the entire set of Streptomyces genomic sequences can be carried by MVs. Hence the aim of this work was to perform the sequencing and analysis of DNA purified from S. coelicolor MVs in order to check whether the entire chromosomal DNA might be associated to MVs.

Two main populations of MVs, namely F3 and F4 MVs, were isolated and purified from liquid cultures of S. coelicolor according to the protocol reported in Materials and Methods. These two MV populations were previously characterized: besides having different diameters (average sizes were about 100 nm and 200 nm in F3 and F4, respectively), they differed also for the composition of their protein and metabolite cargos4. All six gradient fraction were directly loaded on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel and this electrophoresis analysis revealed the presence of three main bands: two smaller bands corresponding to approximately 900 bp and 500 bp, respectively, and a higher molecular weight band of approximately 19 kb (Fig. 1). According to previous works, F3 and F4 were chosen for further investigations as they are the most MV-enriched gradient fractions4,37. Moreover, presence of MVs in F3 and F4 was confirmed through Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1).

Electrophoretic analysis of the nucleic acids associated to fractions F3 and F4 of S. coelicolor MVs. M: DNA Molecular Weight Marker IV (Roche).

The relative intensities of the three bands showed an opposite pattern between the two MV populations: in F3, the 19 kb-band appeared brighter in comparison to the others, while in the F4 fraction the intensities of the 900 bp and 500 bp bands were stronger than the high molecular weight band. In order to identify the nucleic acids present in the F3 and F4 fractions, they were treated with either RNase or DNase. Data obtained revealed that the two smaller bands of both fractions corresponded to RNA, while the high-molecular-weight nucleic acid was DNA (Supplementary Fig. 2).

PCR experiments aiming to identify the DNA content of F3 and F4 were performed by amplifying portions of genes mapping in different regions of S. coelicolor chromosome. To this purpose katA2, catC, dnaK, hrdB, and rrnB were chosen as target genes (Fig. 2).

Map of S. coelicolor A3(2) M145 chromosome. Positions of katA2, catC, dnaK, hrdB, and rrnB are reported. The map was prepared with the software SnapGene Viewer using the sequence of S. coelicolor A3(2) available in GenBank with accession number AL645882.2.

Data obtained revealed that five amplicons of the expected size were obtained from both fractions suggesting that the DNA content of F3 and F4 mirrored the S. coelicolor chromosome (Supplementary Fig. S3).

In order to check which regions of the S. coelicolor chromosome were associated to the MVs, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) of DNA from F3 was performed: F3 was chosen for this analysis because it was the most DNA-enriched fraction. DNA sequencing resulted in 7,692,359 pair-end sequences, with 3,831,272 of them passing the trimming step. 411 contigs were obtained during the assembly step, with N50 = 62,711 bp, GC% = 72.18%, and a total length of 8,580,830 bp. Only the 255 contigs longer than 1000 bp and accounting for a total of 8,545,699 bp, were used for the further scaffolding, which was carried out using the MeDuSa software (see Materials and methods). The resulting scaffold contained a single contig of 8,558,499 bp with GC% = 72.07% and 128 gaps. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis confirmed that the assembled genome belonged to S. coelicolor: indeed, 13 out of 15 reference genomes had an ANI value > 99.9%, as reported in Supplementary Table S2. The two lowest ANI values were probably due to the quality of the corresponding reference genomes; indeed, they had larger numbers of contigs and smaller N50 values (Supplementary Tables S1–S2).

When sequencing reads were mapped on the reference chromosome sequence of S. coelicolor A3(2) (Fig. 3), the analysis showed that the reads covered the whole genome sequence, as suggested by PCR data.

Mapping of sequencing reads on the reference chromosome sequence of S. coelicolor A3(2). (A) Sequence coverage of S. coelicolor A3(2) chromosome. (B) Zoom of the region comprised between positions 5,100,000 and 5,130,000 of the reference genome AL645882.2.

It is noteworthy that, while the average read coverage was 117.5X, a ~ 17 kb-long region of the chromosome (from position 5,106,161 to 5,122,930 of the reference genome with accession number AL645882.2) was overrepresented, having a local average coverage of 1288.5X and including the 25 ORFs listed in Table 1.

Overall, these data demonstrated that the DNA content of the MV population is representative of the entire S. coelicolor chromosome.

The aim of this work was to sequence and to analyze the DNA cargo carried by the MVs of S. coelicolor as we have demonstrated for the first time that two main populations of MVs isolated from liquid cultures of S. coelicolor contain nucleic acids. In particular, one of them (i.e., fraction F3) is enriched with DNA and the other one (i.e., fraction F4) with RNA. Moreover, DNA sequencing demonstrated that the DNA carried by the MVs of fraction F3 is representative of the whole S. coelicolor. This result is in agreement with previous works on outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Dinoroseobacter shibae, showing the presence of the whole genome in OMVs15,38: in addition, it was shown that in D. shibae a specific DNA region of its chromosome was overrepresented, reminding the pattern observed here in S. coelicolor38; however, while in the case of D. shibae that region included the terminus of replication (ter) of its circular chromosome and the overrepresentation could be due to repair of overreplicated DNA, it is still not clear whether this sequence enrichment has a biological meaning in the case of S. coelicolor. For example, this region of S. coelicolor chromosome does not include neither the origin of replication (oriC), whose position is 4,269,853–4,272,747 in the reference sequence39, nor the known ParB-binding sites (i.e., parS) which map in a ~ 400 kb-spanning region centered on the oriC40.

Altogether, these findings strengthen the concept that production of (O)MVs might represent a widespread HGT mechanism, encompassing both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and contributing to the evolution of genes and genomes. Streptomyces genus is among the main producers of bioactive compounds, including antibiotics used to treat human infections; thus, presence of chromosomal DNA in S. coelicolor MVs is of relevant interest. Indeed, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are usually part of biosynthetic gene clusters and can be spread in the environment and be acquired, either directly or indirectly, by other bacteria, including pathogens. At this regard, Jiang et al.41 have suggested the possible HGT of ARGs from Streptomyces to Proteobacteria, including pathogens41.

Different studies suggested that DNA can be localized in the lumen and/or on the surface of MVs: in both cases, independently of its localization, DNA seems to be able to mediate HGT9,15,42. Even in case of DNA associated to the surface of (O)MVs, it was demonstrated that this DNA is involved in HGT: for instance, it was reported that DNase treatment of OMVs from Porphyromonas gingivalis impairs the efficiency of gene transfer8,43. Localization of DNA associated to MVs probably depends on their biogenesis, regarding either viable cells or dying ones: for example, in the latter case, DNA could also be associated to MVs by sticking on the surface of released vesicles44. This kind of cargo loading might be likely in Streptomyces, as programmed cell death is known and exerts a relevant role in the morpho-physiological differentiation of these bacteria45,46.

Three possible mechanisms of MV-mediated HGT were proposed: (i) MV moves closer to the target cell and the DNA on its surface is acquired by the cell by natural competence; (ii) MV associated with the membrane of the target cell undergoes lysis and DNA is acquired by natural competence; (iii) the MV membrane fuses with that of the target cell and the cargo is thus delivered into the cell42,47.

The role of MV DNA in genome evolution is tempting and promising; however, as DNA can be localized on the external surface of MVs, it cannot a priori be excluded that DNA might primarily exert an architectural function in MV formation and/or providing the mechanical support for shape maintenance once MVs are secreted. Moreover, Streptomyces MV DNA could have a possible role to promote mycelial cell adhesion to organic and inorganic substrates or in mycelial cell–cell interaction determining clamp and pellet formation in liquid cultures48. It should not surprise that DNA in MVs can exert other functions besides HGT: indeed, it is known that, in human cells, DNA associated to extracellular vesicles can have multiple roles, such as induction of inflammatory and immune responses by activating pro-inflammatory signaling pathways, and maintenance of cellular homeostasis through the clearance of damaged DNA that might induce apoptosis49.

Besides the physiological role of DNA associated to MVs, new transformation methods and biotechnological applications could take advantage of DNA packaging and delivery through MVs, especially in the case of bacteria being recalcitrant to the more diffuse genetic engineering methods. To this purpose, future works should identify the molecular mechanisms taking part in DNA selection during production of MVs.

We are completely aware that several questions remain opened. Indeed, it should be clarified, for example, if each MV contains (at least) an entire copy of the chromosome, if it is fragmented or not, and if it is bound and packed by proteins. In spite of this, in our opinion, this work represents an important step forward for the comprehension of the mechanisms responsible for the evolution of bacterial species, especially for those species whose genome is complex, such as the Streptomyces one. It is quite possible that the DNA embedded in S. coelicolor MVs might be sufficiently long to contain gene clusters responsible for a single or multiple metabolic pathways. If this is so, the genomes of Streptomyces and/or closer species might undergo fast evolutionary changes by acquiring long DNA stretches and rendering the metabolic versatility of bacteria belonging to this genus particularly consistent.

The strain used in this study was Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) M145 (genotype SCP1− SCP2−)50. 108 spores were inoculated in 30 mL of J medium50, for seed culture, and incubated for 30 h at 30 °C under shaking (200 rpm). The collected biomass was washed twice with sterile water and resuspended in 30 mL of sterile water. Then, 10 mL of the bacterial suspension were inoculated in 500 mL of minimal medium [NaNO3 (1 g/L), MgSO4·7H2O (0.5 g/L), KCl (0.5 g/L), KH2PO4 (1 g/L), glucose (10 g/L), trace element solution (1 mL/L), pH 7; trace element solution contained FeSO4·7H2O (1 g/100 mL), ZnCl2 (1 g/100 mL), and biotin (0.1 g/100 mL)] (MM)51, in a 2 L-baffled flask, and incubated at 30 °C for 136 h, under shaking at 180 rpm. S. coelicolor membrane vesicles were isolated and purified as described previously4. In brief, the culture supernatant was filtered and subsequently concentrated using an Amicon Ultrafiltration system with a 100-kDa exclusion filter (Millipore). Then, it was subjected to sequential centrifugations at 4000 and 15,000 g for 15 min at 4 °C to remove aggregates. The remaining supernatant was ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g (SW 40 Ti Rotor, Beckman Coulter) for 1 h at 4 °C. The pellet was suspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline—DPBS—without Ca2+ and Mg2+) and mixed with the OptiPrep solution (Sigma-Aldrich) to obtain a final 35% v/v OptiPrep solution. A six-layer (35, 30, 25, 20, 15, and 10% v/v) OptiPrep density gradient was set up in a 14 mL ultracentrifugation tube and was ultracentrifuged at 140,000 g for 16 h at 4 °C (SW 40 Ti Rotor, Beckman Coulter). The six fractions of the density gradient (F1 through F6) were collected and diluted with sterile DPBS and ultracentrifuged at 38,400 g (SW 55 Ti Rotor, Beckman Coulter) for 2 h at 4 °C. Pellets were suspended in 0.2 mL of sterile DPBS. 10 μL of all six fraction were visualized on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel. F3 and F4 were used for subsequent procedures, as they contained MVs as demonstrated previously4. DLS analysis was performed to confirm presence of MVs before proceeding with experiments.

5 μL of F3 and F4 MVs were treated with 1 U of DNase I recombinant, RNase-free (Roche), incubating samples at 37 °C for 30 min, in presence of the provided reaction buffer and in a final volume of 10 μL. The treatment with RNase was performed using 5 μL of F3 and F4 MVs and Rnase A (Roche), used at the final concentration of 10 ng/mL in 10 μL; in this case incubation was performed at 37 °C for 1 h. Treated and untreated samples were compared by loading the same amount of MVs on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel (10 μL of treated samples and 5 μL of untreated samples, respectively).

10 μl-aliquots of F3 and F4 MVs were treated with either DNase I recombinant, Rnase-free (Roche) or Rnase A (Roche) following the manufacturer's instructions. Upon treatments, samples were analyzed by 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis in 1X Tris–Acetate-EDTA buffer (TAE). MassRuler DNA Ladder Mix, ready to use (Thermo Scientific) was used as DNA ladder.

SCO7590 (katA2), SCO0560 (catC), SCO3671(dnaK), SCO5820 (hrdB), and SCOr06 (rrnB) genes were amplified from MVs samples using the primer sets listed in Table 2. The reaction mixtures consisted of 1X PCR buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1 U of Taq DNA Polymerase Recombinant (Thermo Scientific), and 1 μL of F3 or F4, used as template. For the amplification of SCO7590, SCO0560, SCO3671, and SCO5820, touchdown PCR conditions were applied as follows: initial denaturation for 3 min at 95 °C, followed by a cycle of 45 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 66 °C and 45 s at 72 °C; a cycle of 45 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 64 °C and 45 s at 72 °C; a cycle of 45 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 62 °C and 45 s at 72 °C; 30 cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C and 45 s at 72 °C. A final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min terminated the program. For SCOr06 thermal cycling conditions were 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 50 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 90 s, and finally 72 °C for 10 min.

DNA from F3 was sequenced by Genomix4life s.r.l. (Salerno, Italy) using the Illumina NextSeq550 platform with a 2 × 150 bp paired-end sequencing. Indexed libraries were prepared with a Nextera DNA Flex Kit (Illumina Inc.). Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic (v. 0.36.4)52: adapter were removed using the ILLUMINACLIP option, then the trimming was performed in two steps using the SLIDINGWINDOW and the MINLEN (set to 90) options. Trimmed reads were assembled using SPAdes (v. 3.12.0)53 with the ‘—careful’ and the ‘—cov-cutoff’ (set to ‘auto’) options. Contigs with a length of > 1000 bp were scaffolded with MeDuSa54 using the reference genomes of Streptomyces coelicolor reported in Supplemetary Table S1. FastANI (v. 1.3)55 was used to calculate the average nucleotide identity (ANI) of orthologous gene pairs in the scaffold and reference genomes.

Trimmed reads were finally mapped on the reference chromosome sequence of S. coelicolor A3(2) (available in GenBank with accession number AL645882.2) using Bowtie2 (v. 2.4.2)56, and duplicate reads were removed with Samtools markdup (v. 1.13)57. The coverage across the entire genome was computed using the ‘genomecov’ function of BEDTools (v. 2.30.0)58 and data were visualized using the Sushi R package (v. 1.34.0)59. All these analyses were performed with software available in the Galaxy platform60.

Raw sequencing reads that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database with the accession number SRR19648592 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRR19648592). The BioProject accession number is PRJNA849152.

Brown, L., Wolf, J. M., Prados-Rosales, R. & Casadevall, A. Through the wall: Extracellular vesicles in Gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria and fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 620–630 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hoefler, B. C. et al. A link between linearmycin biosynthesis and extracellular vesicle genesis connects specialized metabolism and bacterial membrane physiology. Cell Chem. Biol. 24, 1238-1249.e7 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kim, J. H., Lee, J., Park, J. & Gho, Y. S. Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial extracellular vesicles. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 40, 97–104 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Faddetta, T. et al. Streptomyces coelicolor vesicles: Many molecules to be delivered. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 88, e01881-e1921 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gill, S., Catchpole, R. & Forterre, P. Extracellular membrane vesicles in the three domains of life and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 43, 273–303 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Daubin, V. & Szöllősi, G. J. Horizontal gene transfer and the history of life. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a018036 (2016).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Soucy, S. M., Huang, J. & Gogarten, J. P. Horizontal gene transfer: building the web of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 472–482 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Grüll, M. P., Mulligan, M. E. & Lang, A. S. Small extracellular particles with big potential for horizontal gene transfer: membrane vesicles and gene transfer agents. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, fny192 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Domingues, S. & Nielsen, K. M. Membrane vesicles and horizontal gene transfer in prokaryotes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 38, 16–21 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Soler, N. & Forterre, P. Vesiduction: The fourth way of HGT. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 2457–2460 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Yu, Y. J., Wang, X. H. & Fan, G. C. Versatile effects of bacterium-released membrane vesicles on mammalian cells and infectious/inflammatory diseases. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 39, 514–533 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Klieve, A. V. et al. Naturally occurring DNA transfer system associated with membrane vesicles in cellulolytic Ruminococcus spp. of ruminal origin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4248–4253 (2005).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Aktar, S. et al. Incorporation of plasmid DNA into bacterial membrane vesicles by peptidoglycan defects in Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 12, 3565 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Tran, F. & Boedicker, J. Q. Genetic cargo and bacterial species set the rate of vesicle-mediated horizontal gene transfer. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–10 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Bitto, N. J. et al. Bacterial membrane vesicles transport their DNA cargo into host cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–11 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liao, S. et al. Streptococcus mutans extracellular DNA is upregulated during growth in biofilms, actively released via membrane vesicles, and influenced by components of the protein secretion machinery. J. Bacteriol. 196, 2355–2366 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Aytar Çelik, P. et al. Bacterial membrane vesicle functions, laboratory methods, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 54, 107869 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Cao, Y. & Lin, H. Characterization and function of membrane vesicles in Gram-positive bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105, 1795–1801 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Grande, R. et al. Detection and physicochemical characterization of membrane vesicles (MVs) of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1040 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lee, E. Y. et al. Gram-positive bacteria produce membrane vesicles: Proteomics-based characterization of Staphylococcus aureus-derived membrane vesicles. Proteomics 9, 5425–5436 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fröjd, M. J. & Flärdh, K. Extrusion of extracellular membrane vesicles from hyphal tips of Streptomyces venezuelae coupled to cell-wall stress. Microbiology 165, 1295–1305 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

van der Meij, A., Worsley, S. F., Hutchings, M. I. & van Wezel, G. P. Chemical ecology of antibiotic production by actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, 392–416 (2017).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

van Bergeijk, D. A., Terlouw, B. R., Medema, M. H. & van Wezel, G. P. Ecology and genomics of Actinobacteria: New concepts for natural product discovery. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 546–558 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Westhoff, S., Kloosterman, A. M., van Hoesel, S. F. A., van Wezel, G. P. & Rozen, D. E. Competition sensing changes antibiotic production in streptomyces. MBio 12, 1–13 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, Z. et al. Antibiotic production in Streptomyces is organized by a division of labor through terminal genomic differentiation. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay5781 (2020).

Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Shitut, S., Claushuis, B., Claessen, D. & Rozen, D. E. Mutational meltdown of putative microbial altruists in Streptomyces coelicolor colonies. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–9 (2022).

Google Scholar

Sermonti, G. & Spada-Sermonti, I. Genetic recombination in streptomyces. Nature 176, 121–121 (1955).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sermonti, G. & Spada-Sermonti, I. Gene recombination in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Gen. Microbiol. 15, 609–616 (1956).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sermonti, G., Puglia, A. M. & Ficarra, G. The time course of recombinant production in Streptomyces coelicolor. Genet. Res. (Camb) 18, 133–145 (1971).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bibb, M. J. & Hopwood, D. A. Genetic studies of the fertility plasmid SCP2 and its SCP2 variants in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J. Gen. Microbiol. 126, 427–442 (1981).

Google Scholar

Pettis, G. S. & Cohen, S. N. Transfer of the plJ101 plasmid in Streptomyces lividans requires a cis-acting function dispensable for chromosomal gene transfer. Mol. Microbiol. 13, 955–964 (1994).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Vogelmann, J. et al. Conjugal plasmid transfer in Streptomyces resembles bacterial chromosome segregation by FtsK/SpoIIIE. EMBO J. 30, 2246–2254 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Thoma, L. & Muth, G. The conjugative DNA-transfer apparatus of Streptomyces. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 305, 224–229 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Thoma, L. et al. A multiprotein DNA translocation complex directs intramycelial plasmid spreading during streptomyces conjugation. MBio 6, 1–10 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Thoma, L., Vollmer, B. & Muth, G. Fluorescence microscopy of Streptomyces conjugation suggests DNA-transfer at the lateral walls and reveals the spreading of the plasmid in the recipient mycelium. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 598–608 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pettis, G. S. Spreading the news about the novel conjugation mechanism in Streptomyces bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 10, 503–510 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Prados-Rosales, R., Brown, L., Casadevall, A., Montalvo-Quirós, S. & Luque-Garcia, J. L. Isolation and identification of membrane vesicle-associated proteins in Gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria. MethodsX 1, 124–129 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, H. et al. Dinoroseobacter shibae outer membrane vesicles are enriched for the chromosome dimer resolution site dif. mSystems 6, e0069320 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Bentley, S. D. et al. Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nature 417, 141–147 (2002).

Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar

Jakimowicz, D., Chater, K. & Zakrzewska-Czerwínska, J. The ParB protein of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) recognizes a cluster of parS sequences within the origin-proximal region of the linear chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 45, 1365–1377 (2002).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jiang, X. et al. Dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes from antibiotic producers to pathogens. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–7 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Tashiro, Y., Takaki, K. & Futamata, H. Targeted delivery using membrane vesicles in prokaryotes. Biophys. Physicobiol. 16, 114–120 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ho, M. H., Chen, C. H., Goodwin, J. S., Wang, B. Y. & Xie, H. Functional advantages of porphyromonas gingivalis vesicles. PLoS ONE 10, e0123448 (2015).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ghanam, J. et al. DNA in extracellular vesicles: From evolution to its current application in health and disease. Cell Biosci. 12, 1–13 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Manteca, Á., Fernández, M. & Sánchez, J. A death round affecting a young compartmentalized mycelium precedes aerial mycelium dismantling in confluent surface cultures of Streptomyces antibioticus. Microbiology 151, 3689–3697 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tenconi, E., Traxler, M. F., Hoebreck, C., van Wezel, G. P. & Rigali, S. Production of prodiginines is part of a programmed cell death process in Streptomyces coelicolor. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1742 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Fulsundar, S. et al. Gene transfer potential of outer membrane vesicles of Acinetobacter baylyi and effects of stress on vesiculation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 3469–3483 (2014).

Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

El Othmany, R., Zahir, H., Ellouali, M. & Latrache, H. Current understanding on adhesion and biofilm development in actinobacteria. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021, (2021).

Malkin, E. Z. & Bratman, S. V. Bioactive DNA from extracellular vesicles and particles. Cell Death Dis. 11, 1–13 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Kieser, T., Bibb, M. J., Buttner, M. J., Chater, K. F. & Hopwood, D. A. Practical Streptomyces Genetics Vol. 291 (John Innes Foundation Norwich, 2000).

Google Scholar

Vassallo, A. et al. The Streptomyces coelicolor small ORF trpM stimulates growth and morphological development and exerts opposite effects on actinorhodin and calcium-dependent antibiotic production. Front. Microbiol. 11, 224 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).

Article MathSciNet CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bosi, E. et al. MeDuSa: A multi-draft based scaffolder. Bioinformatics 31, 2443–2451 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T. & Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–8 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, 1–4 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Phanstiel, D. H., Boyle, A. P., Araya, C. L. & Snyder, M. P. Sushi.R: Flexible, quantitative and integrative genomic visualizations for publication-quality multi-panel figures. Bioinformatics 30, 2808–2810 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Afgan, E. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucl. Acids Res. 46, W537–W544 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

This work was partly supported by the Assessorato Regionale delle Attività Produttive, Regione Sicilia (BIAS project, P.O.F.E.S.R. 2014/2020 n. 082015000275 to G.G.), and the Università degli Studi di Palermo (FFR 2019-2020 to G.G.). The ATeN Center (Med-CHHAB, PONa3 00273, University of Palermo) is acknowledged for technical support and laboratory hospitality.

Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technology, University of Palermo, 90128, Palermo, Italy

Teresa Faddetta, Giuseppe Gallo & Anna Maria Puglia

School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032, Camerino, Italy

Alberto Vassallo

Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy

Sara Del Duca & Renato Fani

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

A.M.P. and T.F. conceived the project. T.F. performed the experiments. A.V. and S.D.D. analyzed the data. T.F. and A.V. wrote the draft manuscript. A.M.P., G.G., and R.F. reviewed and edited the manuscript. A.M.P., G.G., and R.F. supervised the project. A.M.P. and G.G. funded the project. All authors approved the paper.

Correspondence to Alberto Vassallo.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Faddetta, T., Vassallo, A., Del Duca, S. et al. Unravelling the DNA sequences carried by Streptomyces coelicolor membrane vesicles. Sci Rep 12, 16651 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21002-z

Download citation

Received: 07 July 2022

Accepted: 21 September 2022

Published: 05 October 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21002-z

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.